Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
British Journal of Surgery ; 109(Supplement 5):v52, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2134909

ABSTRACT

Background: Trends in healthcare have caused a shift in training towards more competency based programmes. The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced time available for direct exposure and clinical learning, necessitating incorporation of simulation in training. The objectives of this study were to develop, pilot and evaluate a four week simulation based surgical teaching programme. Method(s): Interns pursuing a career in Surgery joined a near-peer surgical training programme delivered by NCHDs. A survey established a baseline competency. Four skills workshops were delivered. Outcomes were measured using data from pre and post course surveys as well as a surgical skills competition. Result(s): Of The 12 trainees, 71% had scrubbed in theatre before. 50% were already confident to scrub independently, increased to 75% post training. 28% were confident gowning/gloving, increased to 75% post training. 28% were confident to place a Simple suture in theatre, this did not increase despite training. 42% were confident performing an instrument tie, increased to 75% post training. 14% were confident hand tying knots, this increased to 62%. 14% of participants were comfortable performing excisional biopsy in theatre, increased to 62% post training. Preparation and administration of local anaestetic could be performed confidently by 14% before training, this increased to 87%. on completion, a surgical skills competition showed that 100% were able to satisfactorily perform basic skills. Conclusion(s): Near-peer delivery of surgical training has enhanced The basic surgical skills of interns. Similar programmes in other sites would ensure that interns have The skills required to safely care for surgical patients.

2.
British Journal of Surgery ; 109(Supplement 5):v59, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2134878

ABSTRACT

Aim: Acute appendicitis (AA) is among The most common Emergency surgical presentations to Irish hospitals. In 2020, The World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) updated its Jerusalem guidelines for The investigation, diagnosis, and management of AA. We aimed to evaluate our institutional compliance with these guidelines in The COVID era and outline potential areas for improvement. Method(s): We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients admitted to our institution with The diagnosis of AA in July 2021 and compared them against The standards outlined in The WSES Jerusalem guidelines. Result(s): 39 patients were identified. Average age was 25.4 years. 2.6% (n=1) had clinical scores documented. 33.3% (n=13) had computerised tomography scans performed, 33.3% (n=13) underwent ultrasound scans and 33.3% (n=13) had no diagnostic imaging. 100% proceeded with surgical management. Average time to theatre was 16.9 hours. 23.1% (n=9) were open appendectomies, 74.4% (n=29) were laparoscopic appendectomies and 2.6% (n=1) was a laparoscopic converted to open appendectomy. 100% had histopathological analyses. 69.2% (n=27) were true AAs, 15.4% (n=6) were negative appendectomies and 15.4% (n=6) were non-inflamed appendices with other pathology including lymphoid hyperplasia, fecolith or enterobius. Average length of stay (AvLoS) was 3.6 days. Conclusion(s): As regards timely surgical intervention and routine histopathology, we are compliant with The guidelines. However increased utilisation of validated clinical scoring systems could potentially reduce negative appendectomy rates and AvLoS. We believe an educational intervention is required to improve our compliance with these standards.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL